Richard II |
IV lezione 15-28
“Epic objectivity” ( is a callida
iunctura , perspicacious matching of words by Mazzarino, Il pensiero storico classico, Laterza)
The
historiographers profess, declare their impartiality.
The model of latin writers of history was, above all athenian, Tucidide
(460-400 b. C) who gets rid of myth (I, 22, 4) and the fabulous, because he
wants that is History of peloponnesian war might be useful to whom wishes to
learn how works the history whose deeds recur with cyclicity. He asserts to be
realistic and impartial.
Luciano (120-185) in Pw'"
dei' iJstorivan suggravfein As you have to write the history, asserts
:" JO d j ou\n Qoukudivdh"...ejnomoqevthse" (42), Thucidides legislated.On the other side,
already Omero (VIII b. C.) was
objective recognizing valour to Troians and also Erodoto (norn 484-dead after 430) who in the prologue of his
history of persian wars writes: I want to tell the deeds great and wonderful showed
by greeks and barbarians (e[rga megavla te kai; qwmastav,
ta; me;n {Ellhsi, ta; de; barbavroisi ajpodecqevnta)
Well,
Tucidide really legislated and latin Tacito
(55-120) often follows this model: in incipit of his Historiae proclaims his impartiality and objectivity. He does not
deny that his career was made easier by Vespasiano (69-79), Tito (79-81) and even
the bad emperor Domiziano (91-96). The last of these three flavii imperatores (Vespasiano
and his sons) is handed on as very bad, neverheless Tacito writes: "sed
incorruptam fidem professis, neque amore quisquam et sine odio dicendus
est "(Hist. I, 1), but by the writers who profess unshaken faith
everybody must be related without love and hate. This is the first chapter of Historiae that narrated years 69-96 (but
we have only the years 69-70). Historiae
were written about 110 a. C.
Annales are the last work. Tacito died about 117-120
In incipit
of Annales Tacito announces that he will write pauca de Augusto et extrema,
few and the last acts of Augustus, mox
Tiberii principatum, after the reign of Tiberius, et cetera sine ira et studio
quorum causas procul habeo" (I, 1) and the rest (till the death
of Nero, 68 a. C, but we have only years from 14 to 66 a. C, wihout years 29-31
and 37-47) without anger and partisanship whose cause are far from me.
Anyway the
history is not a list of past things, but a connection of deeds in a picture
and the historiographer is a painter who must give soul and body to the ghosts
of history, otherwise he is a guardian of a cemetry who keeps scrupulously the
catalogue of battles and corpses.
However the
objectivity is often only a programmatic introduction, as we can read also in Sallustio’s monograph on the plot of
Catilina (40 b. C.): “Igitur de Catilinae
coniuratione, quam verissume potero paucis absolvam” (Bellum Catilinae I, 4) I shall write about the plot of Catilina few
pages with the maximum historical truth I can. But the author is objective with
Mitridate, not with Catilina.
The fear of tyrant (he fears and frightens).
Metus tyranni is genitive subjective and objective.
Becomes
difficult to write verissume, with
all truth, when the dictatorship is entire and hard. The tyrant fears to lose
his power and to be killed, so he eliminate first of all parrhsiva parresia,
the freedom of world the cell most significant of the body of democracy
In Oedipus by Seneca, Creonte says: “Qui
sceptra duro saevus imperio regit,/timet
timentes; metus in auctorem redit " (vv. 703-704), the cruel
king who keeps the sceptre, the crown, with hard power, fears those who are
afraid of him: the fear turns back to the author of terror, as boomerang
Un paio di pagine
tratte dal percorso sulla letteratura latina che sto preparando per il
Pontificio Ateneo Salesiano
An excursus, a digression in modern literature
Here you
can see how many english words have an etymological relationship with latin
words.
There is a
king of Shakespeare who gives the
reasons of the fear that kings and tyrants have: he is Richard II and speaks
when has lost his power.
The king
deprived of power and a little after of life, exposes the sad history of the
life and death of many kings:
“For God’sake let us sit (lat. sedeo, gr. e[zomai) upon the ground
And tell sad
(–lat. satur,
full) stories
( historia, iJstoriva) of the death of kings:/
How some have been deposed (de-pono), some
slain in war,
Some haunted by the ghosts they have deposed,
Some poisoned
(potio-onis,drink,
) by their wives, some sleeping kill’d,
All murdered
(lat. mors). For within the hollow
Crown (lat. corona, wreath, korwniv") /
That rounds-rotundus- the
mortal temples (lat.mortalia tempora) of a king/
Keeps death his court (cohors, courtyard); and there the antic (antiquus) sits,/
Scoffing his state and grinning at his pomp-( –lat. pompa, pomphv solemn
procession),/
Allowing-late latin.
allocare ( to allot, lat. al – for ad, to, and locare, to place, from locus, a place). him a breath, a little
scene- lat. scena-skhnhv,
To monarchize, be fear’d-(lat. periculum, danger), and kill with looks,
Infusing(lat. infusus p. p. of infundo in e fundo to pour), him with self and vain(vanus) conceit,/
As if this flesh which walls-(vallum and
vallus palisade, vallare, to
entrench)- about our life/
Were brass impregnable
(lat. in negative prefix, not,+prehendere, to take); and humour’d
(-lat. umor-,moisture,
lat. umēre, to be moist)- thus,
Comes at the last, and with a little pin ( lat- pinna , a wing, fin, pen)
bores(-lat. forare)- through his castle (castellum,
dimin. of castrum, a fortified
place) wall, and farewell king!/
Cover (lat. cooperio, to cover) your heads, and mock
not late (l. muccare, to blow the nose
mucus –mucus
from the nose) flesh and blood/
With solemn
(lat sol(l)emnis da sollus,entire, complet)+ annus, year) reverence (reverentia), throw (Idg. base*trē, as in Gk. trh'ma, a hole The grade*ter appears in L. terere, to bore, to consume, GK, teivrein, to bore, to wear out). away respect
(lat. respectus, pp.
of respicio, a looking at)
Tradition (traditus pp of tradere=trā for trans, across,+dere for dare , to give) form-(lat. forma ,shape), and ceremonious-lat caerimonia, a
caeremony, rite) duty;/
For you have but mistook me all this while.
I live with bread, like you; feel want,
Taste-(lat. taxo an
intensive form of tango, I touch) grief
( lat. gravis, heav)-, need
friends. Subjected-(subiectus pp.
of subicio, tu put under, sub under, iacere, to cast, to put) thus ,/
How can you say to me I am a king? (Riccardo
II, III, ii, 155-177)
The royalty
is unmasked and shown naked also in The
tempest (1613) when the boatswain says: “what cares these roarers for the name of King?”
And after,
the same sailor says to the king Alonso and to nobleman Gonzalo: “To cabin: silence trouble-lat. turba- us not!” (I, 1)
Tyrant against authors and books
The
consciousness of precariousness of high position whence is easy to fall down
(in the rugged, steep necessity where one cannot
avail
himself of valid foot, writes Sofocle in Edipo
re - e[nq j ouj podi; crhsivmw/-crh'tai vv. 873-879-), well, such consciousness pushes
the king, or worse the tyrant, to be suspicious and repressive.
Let us read
again Tacito who reveals the methods and arcana
imperii, the secrets of powers: “Neque
in ipsos modo auctores, sed in libros quoque saevītum” (Agricola, 2), not only against the
authors of books but also against books they (several emperors) committed
cruelties.
Several
historical works were burnt publicly in the forum.
CONTINUA
[1] Richard II Plantagenet was king of England from
1377 to 1399. The tragedy by Shakespeare was written in 1595.
Giovanna Tocco
RispondiElimina